

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran has been characterised as a pivotal moment in regional security, often described as the "big one". According to TS Lombard, a more nuanced perspective is needed, one that emphasises the process of attrition rather than the pursuit of clear-cut outcomes.
As the situation evolves, it becomes evident that the volatility of the conflict will have significant implications for oil markets and broader geopolitical dynamics. At the heart of the analysis lies the recognition that the potential outcomes of the conflict are starkly divided.
Possible outcomes
On one end of the spectrum is the possibility of a violent Iranian defeat, which could lead to substantial disruptions in global oil supply. Such a scenario raises concerns about the security of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for oil transportation, and the potential for retaliatory strikes on GCC oil facilities and tankers. The ramifications of a chaotic Iranian collapse could be catastrophic, with the regime resorting to desperate measures that threaten regional stability.
On the other end of the spectrum is a scenario of peaceful Iranian capitulation, where Tehran agrees to abandon its nuclear ambitions in exchange for concessions. This outcome is fraught with challenges, including deep-seated regime infighting and a pervasive lack of trust in the US as a reliable negotiating partner.
The legacy of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action has left a significant trust deficit, complicating any potential diplomatic resolution.
In the immediate term, the conflict is likely to result in continued military degradation and heightened social tensions on both sides. Iran's operational goal appears to be one of survival, viewing the ability to withstand Israeli aggression as a form of victory. This perspective underscores the complexity of the situation, as definitive outcomes remain elusive.
More volatility
As the conflict unfolds, TS Lombard says market participants should brace for frequent volatility in oil prices, driven by shifting narratives and developments on the ground.
The stakes are high, and the path forward will require careful navigation of the intricate dynamics at play. In this environment, understanding the process of attrition may prove more valuable than fixating on binary outcomes, as the region grapples with the profound implications of this enduring conflict.
Join GlobalData.TS Lombard's Christopher Granville, head of geopolitics, and Hamzeh Al-Gaood, Mena analyst, on 19 June at 10am ET/ 3pm GMT.
REGISTER HERE
Different from what? Getting away from scenario analysis based on outcomes
The problem with the outcome map – from Armageddon to peaceful capitulation – is not logical flaws
It’s more about sequencing: extreme attrition is the pre-condition for any definitive outcome
The resulting news cycle bakes in tradable oil market volatility reversions
If you cannot make it, a recording will be distributed
You might also like...
Data discipline is the key to AI success in construction
26 February 2026
Qatar takes a quantum leap in fulfilling LNG ambitions
26 February 2026
Contractor appointed for UAE-Saudi power grid interconnection
26 February 2026
Egypt’s crisis mode gives way to cautious revival
26 February 2026
A MEED Subscription...
Subscribe or upgrade your current MEED.com package to support your strategic planning with the MENA region’s best source of business information. Proceed to our online shop below to find out more about the features in each package.

